Kansas State University Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores, GPA

Kansas State University is a public research university with an acceptance rate of 93%. Located on a 668-acre campus in the town of Manhattan, Kansas, Kansas State was the first land-grant university in the country. The university takes pride in its high number of Rhodes, Marshall, Truman, Goldwater, and Udall scholars. With over 250 undergraduate majors and options, students can choose from an impressive breadth of academic programs. Academics are supported by an 18-to-1  student / faculty ratio. In athletics, the Kansas State Wildcats compete in the NCAA Division I  Big 12 Conference. Considering applying to Kansas State University? Here are the admissions statistics you should know, including average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs of admitted students. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, Kansas State University had an acceptance rate of 93%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 93 students were admitted, making Kansas States admissions process less competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 8,685 Percent Admitted 93% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 43% SAT and ACT Scores and Requirements Kansas State University requires that most applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. The vast majority of students submit ACT scores, and the school does not provide SAT data. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 92% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 21 29 Math 21 27 Composite 22 28 This admissions data tells us that most of Kansas States admitted students fall within the  top 37% nationally  on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to Kansas State scored between 22 and 28, while 25% scored above 28 and 25% scored below 22. Requirements Note that Kansas State does not superscore SAT or ACT results; your highest composite score will be considered. Kansas State does not require the SAT or ACT writing section or SAT Subject tests. Note that some applicants may meet the minimum admission criteria without submitting standardized test scores. GPA In 2018, the average high school GPA of Kansas State Universitys incoming freshmen class was 3.55, and over 60% had average GPAs of 3.5 or higher. This data suggests that most successful applicants to Kansas State have primarily high B grades. Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph Kansas State University Applicants Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph. Data courtesy of Cappex. The admissions data in the graph is self-reported by applicants to Kansas State University. GPAs are unweighted. Find out how you compare to accepted students, see the real-time graph, and calculate your chances of getting in  with a free Cappex account. Admissions Chances Kansas State University, which accepts over 90% of applicants, has a slightly selective admissions process. If your SAT/ACT scores and GPA fall within the schools average ranges, you have a strong chance of being accepted. However, Kansas State is looking for students who have completed a challenging  college preparatory curriculum  in addition to students with good grades. Kansas State has fixed admissions requirements, and students with a 2.0 GPA in a college preparatory curriculum (Kansas residents), or 2.5 GPA for non-residents, as well as one of the following will be eligible for admission: a 21 or higher on the ACT, 1060  or higher on the SAT (ERWM), or a class rank in the top third of their graduating class. Note that applicants to Architecture, Planning and Design, Engineering, Interior Design, Music, Wildlife and Outdoor Management, Business, and Pre-Health programs are held to higher standards than applicants to other Kansas State programs. In the graph above, you can see that the majority of applicants to Kansas State University were admitted. The blue and green dots represent accepted students. Most had SAT scores (ERWM) of 950 or higher, an ACT composite of 18 or higher, and a high school average of a B- or better. If You Like Kansas State, You May Also Like These Schools University of KansasColorado State University - Fort CollinsPurdue UniversityBaylor UniversityTexas Tech UniversityIowa State University All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and Kansas State University Undergraduate Admissions Office.

Should Violent Drug Offenders Be Prison - 1049 Words

There has been debate over whether non-violent drug offenders belong in prison. Some believe all drug offenders should be put in prison, others believe that it depends on circumstances, and, still others believe only violent drug offenders should be incarcerated. Overcrowding is one point of contention. It seems as though the slightest infraction can land a person in prison. Violence is rampant, whether inmate versus inmate or inmate versus guard. Rehabilitation or education is practically non-existent, unless an inmate teaching another inmate how to commit the ‘perfect’ crime is counted. Evidence shows being in prison does little to rehabilitate an inmate. Clearly, the system does not work. Freedom The incarceration rate in America is high. In fact, the highest in the world (Zuckerman, 2014). But should it be? According to Bibas (2015), â€Å"Though America is home to only about one-twentieth of the world’s population, we house almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners.† (para. 1). America, it seems, in its ‘War on Drugs’, has been incarcerating criminals, even non-violent drug offenders, at a high rate. As more offenders are being incarcerated, more stories are being written, including horror stories about what goes on behind prison walls. Considering the nature of some of the crimes committed by inmates, and being mixed in with the violent criminals, non-violent offenders have no place in this hell. Because of overcrowding, abuse of the inmates, and the lackShow MoreRelatedNon-Violent Drug Offenders -Porp. 361741 Words   |  7 PagesHave you heard the phrase prisons are over populated!? Statistics show 21.2% of low level drug offenders, that are incarcerated, do not have any current or prior violence in their records, no involvement in sophisticated criminal activity and no prior commitment. (USDOJ) Could this be the problem of prisons being over populated? There are many factors that need t o be considered when looking for other possible methods of dealing with non-violent drug offenders. Some lawmakers believe the onlyRead More Nonviolent Offenders Essay1495 Words   |  6 PagesNonviolent Offenders – Is Incarceration the Answer? nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; â€Å"It’s really clear that the most effective way to turn a nonviolent person into a violent one is to send them to prison,† says Harvard University criminologist James Gilligan. The American prison system takes nonviolent offenders and makes them live side-by-side with hardened killers. The very nature of prison, no matter people view it, produces an environment that is inevitably harmful to its residentsRead MoreEssay about Negative Consequences of Mandatory Sentencing747 Words   |  3 Pagesinto motion. The original goals of the mandatory sentencing laws were to stop repeat offenders and to exhibit a get tough attitude on crime. These laws have not been working as intended, instead mandatory sentencing has led to some unfortunate consequences. Some of these consequences are overcrowding in prisons and less prison based rehabilitation. Mandatory sentencing laws do not narrowly target major drug traffickers. Today there are 100 separate federal mandatory minimums located in 60 differentRead MoreThe United States Prisons And Federal Prisons959 Words   |  4 Pagesand Federal Prisons. The number of incarcerations have been on the rise since 1980 and it continues to quadruple. State and federal prisons are over crowed with non-violent offenses. With overcrowded jails it has caused the economy more money and created dangerous living environments. Instead of incarceration what should be given is a realistic alternative for their actions. The government will also spend less money. Non-violent offenders are taking up over 60 percent of American prisons. The majorityRead MoreMandatory Sentencing For Non Violent Crime1050 Words   |  5 Pagesovercrowding within the prison system and one has factored in all reasons that can lead up to the cause of overcrowding in order to find a solution to this tremendous issue. Mandatory Sentencing To begin, mandatory sentencing for non-violent and drug- related crimes should be eliminated. This law was established to dispose of the drugs masters and to reduce the selling of drugs in neighborhoods. However, this resulted in an adverse effect; with nonviolent drug and first time offenders getting brutal sentencesRead More235764916 CJA 394 Week 1 Criminal Justice Overview Paper SAMPLE page only1665 Words   |  7 PagesSelect one of the following issues: †¢ Racial profiling †¢ Prison overcrowding †¢ The war on drugs †¢ Increased use of technology †¢ Cultural diversity Write a 1,050- to 1,705-word paper addressing how your selected issue affects the criminal justice system as a whole. †¢ Describe some of the change(s) the criminal justice system as a whole has made in response to the issue you selected. †¢ Include your opinion on whether the changes are sufficient. Should more changes be made, and if so, what changes?   FormatRead MoreThe Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Laws1613 Words   |  7 Pagesirrevocable prison terms of a specific length for people convicted of particular federal and state crimes. As of January 2014, more than 50 percent of inmates in federal prisons are serving time for drug offenses, and more than 60 percent of people incarcerated are racial and ethnic minorities. The use of safety valves and implementation of the Fair Sentencing Act are a few methods Congress employed to combat racial disparity in prisons. Mandatory minimum sentencing harshly punishes non-violent offendersRead MoreSentencing Guidelines For Non Violent Drug Offenders1371 Words   |  6 PagesThe United States’ prison population is currently number one in the world. As a nation that proclaims freedom for citizens, the United States houses more than one million more persons than Russian and almost one million more persons than China. Currently, the United States makes up five percent of the worldâ€℠¢s population and imprisons twenty-five percent of the world’s inmate population. Drug offenders who committed no act of violence make up a large portion of the inmates in the United States. CountyRead MoreMandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines For The United States853 Words   |  4 PagesEventually, the government is going to realize that they are wasting money and putting people’s lives in danger. Overcrowded prisons are a threat to everyone involved. To alleviate the situation, correctional institutions need to downsize inmate populations. I believe one of the main reasons prisons are overcrowded is due to mandatory minimum sentencing. The U.S has very strict sentencing guidelines when it comes to sentencing. According to Hooker and Hirsh, â€Å"A felony conviction generally, by lawRead MoreMandatory Minimum Sentencing On Violent Crimes Essay1492 Words   |  6 PagesCanon Mandatory Minimum Sentencing on Violent Crimes Crime in America is growing at a substantial rate and repeat offenders are playing a huge roll in this growth. Mandatory minimum sentences, first established in Connecticut in 1969 and expanded throughout the 1980s and 1990s, exemplify a shift in public policy to impose a specific amount of imprisonment based on the crime committed and the defendant’s criminal history, and away from other individual offender characteristics and circumstances. A

Employee Motivation Business Organizational Leader

Question: Describe the Employee Motivation for Business Organizational Leader. Answer: In this competitive era, organizational leaders have realized that motivation is a key driver of employee productivity and the organization can achieve its goals and objectives only when employees are committed and motivated. It is important that the employer should focus to motivate the employees through various intrinsic and extrinsic manners. An example would be if the changes affected the employees in a positive way, by the means of salary increase or promotions. The employees will then benefit from the changes being implemented successfully. When an organization is able to include all stakeholders in the strategic planning and leaves room for self-improvement the employees are able to see whats in it for them (Lazaroiu, 2015). Such rewards are good ways of motivating and rewarding employees after successful changes have been implemented. The implementation process of the strategic plan must be flexible enough and inclusive of all stakeholders. This in turn will motivate the empl oyees to invest in the company and consider the rewards that will be offered. For employees to feel motivated, it is important that they should be able to relate themselves to organization. It can happen if they can understand the organization mission and vision and they can align their personal goal and mission with the organizational goals and objectives. Employers can do this if they can provide a platform where employees can feel themselves associated with the organization and leadership. The Maslow theory of motivation suggests that different employees have different levels of motivation (Maslow, 2015). The managers and leaders of Target should realize the difference between the trigger points of motivation of employees at different levels. The employers must realize that the motivation trigger of a factory worker at Target may not be same as the motivation trigger of a sales executive of Target. It is important to mention that leaders also play a key role in motivation. The presence of a leader cannot be replaced. Therefore, being available becomes crucial when team members know that their leader is not absent nor missing in action. Leadership continuously reaches out to his or her team in order to update, but also to go beyond that to general queries about life, day, and social life. It can be said that employers or leaders should focus to empower employees to motivate them. Empowerment in it-self can be fortified by encouraging creativity and adaptiveness. The dev elopment of groups that can share ideas across the functionality of the organization will be the inspiration of adaptively and innovation leading to collaboration. Therefore the building of good positive and communicative relationships within self-motivated groups will stand a better chance of success towards collaboration and efficiency of the organization. The employers can also use Herzberg motivation theory to keep employees motivated. Herzberg's findings revealed that certain characteristics of a job are consistently related to job satisfaction, while different factors are associated with job dissatisfaction. These factors can be shown as: The characteristics associated with job dissatisfaction are called hygiene factors. When these have been adequately addressed, people will not be dissatisfied nor will they be satisfied. Therefore, it is important that the employers should focus on both sets of factors to keep employees motivated. The employers should also realize that there could also be certain internal factors of motivation. People choose to be self-employed motivated by different factors, such as the need to create a sustainable income, allowing innovation to grow freely or achieving a work-life balance.As Smith Shields (2013) emphasized organizational structures and organizational designs need to be aligned with the organization's purpose and goals. Defining metrics and incorporating metrics as part of a managers and a followers accountability plan creates transparency between managers and followers in an organizational design. The monitoring of metrics ensures the organizational design is effective. The reward can be a motivator to achieve the results set out through the organizational design. Manzoor (2012) analyzed the motivations of the individual to determine that people were most productive when they were satisfied they were making a difference and happy in their work. The Belbin theory is an important theory of motivation in team role. The senior execuives and leaders of Target could also use this theory to keep employees motivated. The Belbin theory advocates that in a team setting, people should be clearly aware of their role. The effective demarcation of the team roles would enable the team to perform better. With this theory, the leaders of Walmart should define the clear role for different employees spread across various teams in the organization. It is important that the Belbin theory should be established as a culture at Target and this culture should cascade from top management to mid level management and from mid-level management to low level employees. According to Kepp (2014), Adapting to changes in the environment is important to managerial and organizational success. Managers must be able to make decisions contingent on current circumstances (Para. 4). Particularly in todays global and technologically innovative world, circumstances can change very quickly. Organizations must have managers on board who can quickly adapt to these changing circumstances and who can make quick decisions based on what is happening at that moment. The best way to achieve this is to have a contingency plan. A manager should be prepared for as many scenarios as possible, and have solutions in place in the event the scenario comes to fruition. Elliger, Watkins, and Bostrom (1999) also indicates that helping employees to broaden their comfortability with decision making is significant because it helps them to see things differently, from a different perspective, and transforms their ability to utilizing different viewing lenses moving forward. The goal i s to be able to promote from within since current personnel are familiar with the current culture and environment. This added benefit might require less training and time spent in guidance at the next level and the focus can be shifted too much needed areas. It is important that the employers should focus to create a culture where employees can feel self-motivated. In an organizational setting, different employees would have different needs and it is the responsibility of employers to understand the need of employees. It would be correct to say that understanding the need of employees is the first step to keep employees motivated. Another key driver of employee motivation is communication. Cerasoli (2014) argued that effective communication at workplace would also keep employees motivated. It is important that employers should establish both formal and informal communication channels to keep an open dialogue with employees. Target is a large organization and the organization has managers at various levels. It is important that the leaders and managers should be able to communicate the organizational values to mid level managers and low-level employees. Brown (2016) talks about managers using facilitative learning to stimulate and encoura ge subordinates to be able to think and act as if they were managers, and need to make decisions in simulated situation. One benefit to this type of behavior and atmosphere is that it gives employees on all levels, the courage to act and make day-to-day decisions on the spot given the severity of the situation. Managers simply provide support and constructive feedback on the thought process and outcomes of the situations, stimulating growth from reflections on subordinates. There could be some employees that would feel motivated by the obvious factors like salary, compensation and rewards. At the same time, there could be some employees that would feel motivated by the factors like workplace condition, support from managers, etc. The employers should focus on all the different ways and parameters to keep employees motivated. It would be correct to say that employee motivation is an internal thing. However, employers can certainly create a culture where employees can work with high m otivation levels. Therefore, it is important that the leaders of Target should focus to create such culture. References Cerasoli, C.P., Nicklin, J.M. and Ford, M.T., 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,140(4), p.980. Devito, L., Brown, A., Bannister, B., Cianci, M. and Mujtaba, B., 2016. Employee Motivation based on the Hierarchy of Needs, Expectancy and the Two-Factor Theories Applied with Higher Education Employees.International Journal of Advances in Management, Economics and Entrepreneurship,3(1), p.20. Ellinger, A. D., Watkins, K. E., Bostrom, R. P. (1999). Managers as Facilitators of Learning in Learning Organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(2), 105-124. Kepp, K. (2014). Theories About Organizational Structure. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/theories-organizational-structure-2777.html Lazaroiu, G., 2015. Employee Motivation and Job Performance.Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, (14), pp.97-102. Manzoor, Q.A., 2012. Impact of employees motivation on organizational effectiveness.Business management and strategy,3(1), p.1. Maslow, A.H., 2015. A theory of Human Motivation.Classics of Organization Theory,50, p.142. Smith, D.B. and Shields, J., 2013. Factors related to social service workers' job satisfaction: Revisiting Herzberg's motivation to work.Administration in Social Work,37(2), pp.189-198.